#
ENJA

research-agora

rpatrik96/research-agora

Research Agora is a community-driven skills marketplace providing modular AI workflows tailored for machine learning research and academic paper writing.

14 4MITUpdated 2026-08-13

Overview

This collection provides a comprehensive set of AI workflows spanning the entire academic research lifecycle, from initial literature synthesis and brainstorming to experiment tracking, LaTeX verification, citation checking, and conference presentation creation. Designed primarily for machine learning researchers targeting top venues like NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR, it integrates cleanly with developer environments to enforce standards, automate routine drafting tasks, and provide rigorous peer-review simulation.

Capabilities

  • Interactive research brainstorming and decision checkpointing
  • Automated literature discovery and related work synthesis
  • Citation verification and bibliography fact-checking
  • Experimental claim validation against codebases
  • LaTeX document synchronization and equation verification
  • Simulated peer review and reviewer response generation
  • Conference poster and slide deck generation

Best for

Brainstorming and structuring machine learning research directions interactively, Writing, editing, and fact-checking paper drafts, abstracts, introductions, and bibliographies, Verifying experimental claims against source code and validating statistical rigor, Simulating peer reviews and generating structured rebuttals to conference reviewer comments, Creating academic conference posters and presentation slides

Works with

Claude Code
Evoa Score breakdown= Σ (score × weight)
79
Task usefulness20%100 → +20.0

実タスクにどれだけ役立つか(機能の豊富さ・用途の明確さ)。 AIによるcapabilities/use-cases解析

Code quality15%90 → +13.5

実装・指示の品質。 AIによるSKILL.md/README解析

Maintenance15%100 → +15.0

リポジトリがどれだけ活発に保守されているか。 GitHub 最終push日時の新しさ

Documentation12%48 → +5.8

ドキュメントの充実度・分かりやすさ。 README/独自要約の情報量

Security15%80 → +12.0

危険・不審な挙動が無いか。 AIによるセキュリティレビュー

Originality10%85 → +8.5

ありふれたラッパーではない独自性。 AIによる独自性判定

Popularity8%34 → +2.7

コミュニティの採用度。 GitHub Stars/Forks(対数スケール)

Compatibility5%25 → +1.3

対応AIエージェントの広さ。 AIによる対応エージェント判定

Weighted total78.7 / 100

ライセンス不明/制限あり(Red)のSkillは総合スコアに0.85倍の補正を適用します。 ランキングはこのScoreのみで決まり、広告で変わりません。 算出方法の詳細 →

Security considerations

Execution of local code integration and repository analysis commands; ensure sensitive or unpublished private data is excluded unless using compliant paid enterprise tiers.

Categories

Summary and analysis are original content generated by AI Skills Rank. The skill's source text is not reproduced here — view it on the linked repository.